Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mykola Rabchevskiy's avatar

The only clear and objectively testable definition of intelligence is the ability to generate knowledge, as opposed to the ability to adapt and use knowledge created by someone else. The implication of this is something that is psychologically unacceptable to most modern AI experts: intelligence does not require the ability to process natural language, which is the means of adapting knowledge created by someone else.

Expand full comment
Albert Cory's avatar

Peter, I couldn't agree less with "We need to understand intelligence in order to build it."

AI had a very long & futile history before the recent breakthroughs. Researchers thought they need linguists with a deep understanding of language to achieve NLP. No, they just needed billions of samples.

AI has done what it's done because of massive computing power. It doesn't have to EVER do everything humans can do, as long as it does something useful.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts